Page 1 - Jump to:
Fansite Q&A 5: SC2A | May 28th 2009, 09:42 | |
|
Well its finally our time to shine, thanks to everyone who submitted questions, and thanks to Karune, Cydra and the rest of the blues.
It seems however, that none of the editor questions I submitted were answered, oh well! Enjoy! |
|
| May 28th 2009, 10:03 | |
|
There is some good info here. 2) So, vikings now do +10 Damage vs. massive, that can be handy, but does that mean it now does 40 total vs. massive. 7)EMP is AoE again is it, this can come in handy and make those pesky high templar fear the Terrans, and only four units have more than 100 shields. Hmm one Hallucination Phoenix, now that can be a useful scout indeed.
@Gear, It looks like they want to keep as many surprises with the new editor a possible. |
|
| May 28th 2009, 10:05 | |
|
At least I now finally know that HSM can attack air units. Nothing seems to be safe from it.
Though I walk through the valley of the Dark Templar,
I shall fear no...(head gets sliced off) |
|
| May 28th 2009, 10:12 | |
|
Good questions and answers.
''Hang in there. We're in the final stretch."
-Dustin Browder, 16/02/09 |
|
| May 28th 2009, 10:19 | |
|
Very good Q&A. Way better than yesterdays Q&A batch 51.
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 10:46 | |
|
Yea, congrats to all whos questions go answered!
However, I feel that some of their answers were really half-assed and didnt really explain what the poster asked. HSM sounds like it will either be really OP (one shotting an ENTIRE STACK OF MUTAS (potentially more than 11!) or really worthless (too easy to dodge). I mean, thats like if you could make a reaver in the air almost... Hallucination seems ok for 50 energy, but the units should have some kind of ability that goes with them. |
|
| May 28th 2009, 10:56 | |
|
Wow this q&a is much better than the last one from scl.They are much more detailed
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 11:07 | |
|
Yay!
But yea, if Blizzard picks the questions, why did they pick Dillinger's question about EMP everyone knew it was back in again? And I seriously wanted to hear about the campaign or the campaign editor. But yea, compared to a few of the other sites, I'd say we had pretty decent questions.
BETABETABETAYES.
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 11:10 | |
|
Nice batch. Good to know they're keeping tabs on the stacking aspect.
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 11:46 | |
|
Hmmm...now that is strange.
I thought for the thor to get its aoe anti ground ability, it would lose its air attack but now it still has it. Vikings with bonus vs massive is old news but when they answered question 2, i thought they were gonna say that the bc lost the missile barrage (HSM anyone)...but it didnt |
|
| May 28th 2009, 12:06 | |
|
The Hunter Seeker Missile seems like an interesting gamble if anything. Seems like the ability isn't overpowered as Mutalisks are highly mobile so you'll just have to outrun the darn thing (so it'll only buy the enemy more time).
I just hope that if a unit gains sufficient distance it'll cause the HSM to immediately "die" as opposed to following you across the map for however many seconds it has. That to me seems more unfair than the actual damage. At least then, you could use a mobile unit's speed as an advantage to disable the attack completely and return to the assault. A player who isn't careful of course will be slaughtered (in the case of stacked units). Still not happy about EMP draining absolutely all energy but what are you gonna do? #4 is quite interesting, I had assumed that the bigger the target, the better the "reward" but it seems to not be the case.
Miles' broken hand FTW!
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 12:28 | |
|
/facepalm did some of the people that asked the questions even look at our game guide here? and some questions were kinda silly.
Edit: But it beats the SCLegacy Q&A hands down.
Quotes of the Year!
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 12:56 | |
Some of these questions are now outdated, but werent when we asked them. |
|
| May 28th 2009, 13:23 | |
|
@Knee - on the post it says 100 energy for hallucination spell..
And guess what - they nerfed the Hall.. Can't believe it.. Perhaps it would be good to ask Blizz whether for real or not Phoenix's damage has been nerfed, and why .. How do i do that ??
|
|
| May 28th 2009, 13:46 | |
Go to the Battle.net forums and whine till someone of the staff answers your question or wait for the beta to see if the units is really nerfed. Judging from a recent hands on, it's quite agile and attacks fast (better than a corsair) so wait till you call it "nerfed". I always think something got shot at by foam darts when I hear that term. (Yes, I know where "nerfed" came from.)If Blizzard hadn't taken so long to answer these Q&As then a lot of the ones we saw as being "lame" may have actually been interesting and revealing new info. The selective nature of what they chose to answer also cuts down on the expected quality. Hallucination seems fine to me, and energy costs are subject to balance.
Miles' broken hand FTW!
|
0
Of 3 Topics created22 Topics read
0
Of 10 Posts created



(Yes, I know where "nerfed" came from.)







